Subject:
|
Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 18 Sep 2004 20:15:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4395 times
|
| |
| |
"Jeff Pelletier" <jeff@studio7733.com> wrote in message
news:I496JG.Io6@lugnet.com...
snipped some old stuff.
> I couldn't agree more with what David said. As a gay person, I ask no more and
> no less than to speak equally with someone. If a straight person I talk to
> mentions "I went to the Lego store with my wife, blah blah blah" then I do in
> fact desire the same opportunity to say something equal about my partner. No
> more, no less. This isn't "flaunting" - its talking about my life.
>
> I also need to note that a good amount of the conversation on this forum is
> amazingly offensive to me personally. There is a lot of "gays want you think
> this or they want you to accept them because..." kind of conversation. I would
> ask that everyone speak for themselves and not for me. I wouldn't dare speak
> for how a straight person thinks and I think its incredibly rude and ignorant to
> speak for anyone else BUT yourself. The conversation will be a lot more civil
> that way (and it can be - just because people disagree doesn't mean we can't
> discuss or share).
>
> And while I can honestly understand the opinion being tossed out that there
> shouldn't be any splinter groups, whether for LGBT or catholic or what not - I
> think that much of the tone of this forum has created an environment, at least
> for me, where I would not feel comfortable sharing any LGBT related MOCS in a
> general forum. If Lugnet is about creating an online environment where ALL
> people can share and learn from each other about Lego, then quite frankly, I
> think that this thread has dictated a clear NEED for a LGBT sub group and not
> otherwise.
>
> And please, I would personally request out of respect for gay people (and hell,
> all people) that the comparisons to sexual orientation (something I believe and
> most of science agrees with me is innate and genetic by nature and thus not able
> to change) with one's preference for drinking coke, eating oysters, etc. be
> stopped. Its really quite offensive (although I do understand the basis behind
> the argument you are trying to make). Just as you wouldn't compare other
> identities which aren't necessarily "visible" (disabilities, religion,
> socio-economic status, etc.) to fruit (pun intended), please don't do the same
> to LGBT individuals. Its demeaning to me.
>
> This has been a rather unpleasant way to welcome myself to the Lugnet community,
> but nevertheless, hello. LOL.
Hi, this is a good post, but there is something I do not understand with it:
You wrote: "where I would not feel comfortable sharing any LGBT related MOCS
in a general forum"
I have to ask: Why the heck not? What is a LGBT related MOC? How would it
look like? I simply cannot understand how a MOC can represent a persons
sexual preference without depicting actual sexual stuff? Sexual stuff does
not (What I know off) belong on Lugnet.
Not everyone is building stuff to decorate wedding cakes with. (And this is
the only MOC I can think of)
Or is a need to discuss private matters regarding personal life with others
that are in the same situation?
My personal view is that I keep that kind of personal stuff by myself, or in
other related forums. But that is my personal view, and probably not shared
by others.
Excuse me if I have missed something, but I had to ask.
Be well! And play on!
/Joakim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| (...) Joakim, No problem asking. Several examples of LGBT related MOCs were already brought up, but to recap: there was a castle inhabited by lesbians, a gay bar, a gay "ghetto" (most big cities have one - NYC's Chelsea, Seattle's Capitol Hill, (...) (20 years ago, 18-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| (...) I couldn't agree more with what David said. As a gay person, I ask no more and no less than to speak equally with someone. If a straight person I talk to mentions "I went to the Lego store with my wife, blah blah blah" then I do in fact desire (...) (20 years ago, 18-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
207 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|