To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 25780
25779  |  25781
Subject: 
Re: Lavender Brick Society
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 17 Sep 2004 15:57:36 GMT
Viewed: 
7116 times
  
Hello!



> No other group
> is so easily overlooked (intentionally or not) in everyday life.

So why whould one (intentionally or not) _look_ at them?


> You can't walk
> up to a black man and think, "This person is white," without knowing that you're
> lying to yourself.  Black people are black, and white people are white

There's no reason that I actually _think_ "this person is black" It's just how a
person is, it's obvious, it's not a matter of must-think-about.
I don't look at a random person and think "hm, this guy could have diabetes.",
either. That's none of my business (unless I'm a doctor and the situation is a
medical inspection). So why whould I ought to know if a person is straight or
gay? (Yes, I can imagine situations when i would want to know if a person is
straight or gay but those situations are not what Lugnet is for in the first
place.)


> straight is the assumed standard, so unless a person makes a point of telling
> you their sexual orientation (either by stating it outright, or by making it
> unignorably blatantly clear through Jack McFarland-esque behavior), it's very
> easy to assume they're all straight.

It's also the assumed standard not to have diabetes.


> > And by the way, for those of you who like political correctness

That's certainly not me ;)


Bye
Jojo



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Lavender Brick Society
 
(...) Johannes, I think you stated yourself very well on these points. The issue that underlies this is that these people want you to know they are gay - they don't want you to assume the are not because they are offended at being assumed to be gay (...) (22 years ago, 18-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Lavender Brick Society
 
(...) Of course not. If you disagree with women, you get labelled mysoginistic or male-chauvanistic, not homophobic. That wouldn't make any sense at all. Anyways, there is evidence that suggests that those who are rabidly homophobic are actually (...) (22 years ago, 17-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.people, lugnet.org)

207 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR