 | | Re: Fair and Balanced, as always.
|
| (...) You edited out everything but what was convenient to your attack and you think you won't be called on it? You missed your calling, John, you should be heading the election to re-elect Bush. :-) -->Bruce<-- (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Fair and Balanced, as always.
|
| (...) Not so much an attack as a rib. Why defend a sinking, stinking, garbage barge? (...) I wish I were! It appears to be the easiest job around these days;-) JOHN (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Fair and Balanced, as always.
|
| (...) You defend Bush all the time, so evidentily you don't practice as you preach. :-). (...) Being a slacker and a professional prevaricator is your ambition in life? :-) -->Bruce<-- (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Fair and Balanced, as always.
|
| (...) You weren't listening....I said sinking, stinking, garbage barge:-) You know, I have criticisms of Republicans, too, but you all have that angle covered, so my input is extreneous! (...) How much does it pay? :-) JOHN (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Fair and Balanced, as always.
|
| (...) Well, technically you are correct: I regard Bush as sunk, not sinking. Though I suppose you could be refering to the polls and not how history will judge him, which may lead to your confusion on that front. (...) Can't say how many, but (...) (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
