Subject:
|
Re: suspended Bricklink shops
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 24 Aug 2004 09:02:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1645 times
|
| |
|
|
| |
But wosrt of all, while I see how Larry’s store should be shut down while in
violation of the TOS or Dan’s wishes, but Larry as at *least* a BL buyer is
totally unrelated to the issue at hand. Removing his account entirely seems
completely unjustified, as Larry didn’t seemingly make any mistakes as a
buyer, only as a seller.
|
As a buyer/seller on ebay, Amazon and Bricklink I want the admins to protect me
from individuals which don’t respect the ToS.
If a chap on ebay has a feedback rating of “-2” as a buyer on ebay would you
bid on his auctions?
Scott A
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: suspended Bricklink shops
|
| (...) Now that's just ridiculous. While I would understand your concern if his TOS violation was in regards to non-payment or non-shipping, let's face it, it wasn't. It was about a particular policy which hadn't been clearly enough spelled out until (...) (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: suspended Bricklink shops
|
| (...) I'm not sure I'd say that it needs him so much as would be better off *with* him than without, particularly if 'without' means bad press. (...) You *are* expressing an opinion, but that wasn't my point there. The "the most off base comment" (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
131 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
