 | | Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution —David Laswell
|
| | | (...) Dude, you've flat out told me to stay out of discussions where I've had more authority to participate than you, or where the only person who really had authority to answer was known to be incommunicado at that time. You may not be seeing (...) (20 years ago, 31-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | (...) I guess it depends on who you think gets to interpret the constitution and define our rights. The Supreme Court has at least sometimes supported the understanding that Larry and I share (I think), that the 9th is an umbrella for all rights (...) (20 years ago, 2-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution —David Laswell
|
| | | | | | (...) Prior to 1965, the 9th Amendment was not used to restrict the states from excercising their 10th Amendment rights. At that point, it was used to safeguard the privacy of one's home, but subsequent citations of the 9th Amendment have shown that (...) (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution [may offend] —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) I have a friend who, when we were kids, tended to use the F-word far too often. He was careful never to do this in front of his parents. On the one occasion he did, his father ordered him to "Stop f*$%£@&g swearing". I suppose, this is a case (...) (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
