To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 2510
2509  |  2511
Subject: 
Re: Blue Hopper Car Mania...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 16 Nov 1999 14:34:44 GMT
Viewed: 
1029 times
  
Then I see nothing wrong at all - or at least no more wrong than our voodoo3
purchase.  My wife and I both maintain our own computers, and we both happened
to need video cards at the same time.

Naji


In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tom Stangl writes:

However, Mike has noted before that his and his wife's choices in movies are • quite
different, so they might as well be separate collections.

Naji Norder wrote:

In lugnet.market.shopping, Mike Stanley writes:
Jasper Janssen <jasper@janssen.dynip.com> wrote:
On Thu, 11 Nov 1999 04:44:37 GMT, cjc@NOSPAMnewsguy.com (Mike Stanley)
wrote:

My point would be that the end result is the same.  I get both DVDs.
Now you could say that we're actually conducting a separate
transaction after he completes his with the retailer, at no extra
expense to me (except for maybe all the free computer support he
needs) but that's just a mostly irrelevant middle step.  In the end,
both DVDs end up on my rack, with the retailer making the exact same
amount from shipping them to two locations as if they had just
shipped them to one.


Mike,
   I certainly don't disagree with you.  I have "bent" purchase resrictions
myself.  (Marcia and I both bought Voodoo3s with the mail-in rebate; I used • my
parent's address.)  However, I think that the fact that the "end result is • the
same" is what makes it "bending" the rules.  In the case of DVDs, I think • the
retailer's intentions are for only one CD from each sale to end up on a • given
person's "rack".  Thus, if two people live separately in a house, they • probably
wouldn't mind that you both use the coupon.  Since you and your wife likely
don't maintain separate DVD collections, I think they would mind.  They • limit
to "one per household" instead of "one per collection" because they don't • have
any way to really control the latter.

Naji

--
| Tom Stangl, Technical Support          Netscape Communications Corp
|      Please do not associate my personal views with my employer



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Blue Hopper Car Mania...
 
<slrn82mo7i.75t.cjc@...s.utk.edu> <FL3EHw.BM9@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit However, Mike has noted before that his and his wife's choices in movies are quite different, so they might as well (...) (25 years ago, 12-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

178 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR