Subject:
|
Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:12:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2512 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
|
I think its more accurate to say that our founding fathers believed rights
to be inherent to some people,
|
Careful, dont fall into the trap of thinking they were of one mind on
everything. I fall into this trap a lot myself. The D of I, the articles of
confederation and the constitution are held by many to be compromise
documents, particularly in the area of slavery. Not all northern FFs liked
slavery but they did feel they needed to include the slave colonies in the
Union to be viable so they compromised.
|
Thats true, of course--they were distinct individuals with distinct ideas. My
intent, though, was to show that the document they brought to the table allowed
the denial of rights to certain groups for the most mundane and terrestrial of
reasons: politics.
|
You could argue they should not have done so. That would be an interesting
Alternate History to write...
|
Jeez, thats a good question. Would the DOI and Constitution ever have been
signed if the forward-thinking FF had demanded the abolition of slavery? And
what would have happened to the infant US economy in the wake of this demand?
Interesting...
Dave!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
200 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|