 | | Re: polygyny in "biblical times" —Scott Arthur
| | | | (...) What does it imply to you? (...) Do you think that negates my point? Scott A (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: polygyny in "biblical times" —David Eaton
| | | | | (...) That you were making a joke? Great! A joke it was. (...) Negates your joke? By no means! Does it negate your "point" that polygyny was still common in NT times? No, but it unless it was solely a joke, your use of the quote had about as much (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: polygyny in "biblical times" —Scott Arthur
| | | | | Somehow, I get the feeling you are being deliberately obtuse. Scott A (20 years ago, 25-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: polygyny in "biblical times" —David Eaton
| | | | | (...) Really? I kinda get the same impression... DaveE (20 years ago, 26-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | |
