To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 25027
25026  |  25028
Subject: 
Re: Bad news for NASA
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.nntp
Followup-To: 
lugnet.admin.nntp
Date: 
Thu, 22 Jul 2004 17:57:13 GMT
Viewed: 
4537 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:

   I have forceFUTed your post (and am considering others in the tree as well) to .debate as it’s veering in that direction

...

But since it didn’t actually become a debate, shouldn’t it be left alone? I thought it was a very interesting thread, and was surprised to find it just disappeared - if it wasn’t for Steve’s post, I wouldn’t have had any idea that it was “Forced” to move.

   Hope that helps. Questions or concerns about the force to my email... I’m still not sure what the right level of notification/intervention is.

Well, at the very least, do what any proper FUT requires - cross post the notification to BOTH groups.

IMO, forcing threads to move should be a rare occurence, and shouldn’t be abused to move threads around (and disrupt the readership) just because a thread is “veering in that direction”.

But that’s just me thinking aloud.

FUT .admin.nntp

Dan



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Bad news for NASA
 
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Kelly McKiernan wrote: (snip) I have forceFUTed your post (and am considering others in the tree as well) to .debate as it's veering in that direction (discussions of the merits of funding are probably not nearly as well (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

7 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR