Subject:
|
Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 22 Jul 2004 16:04:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1428 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks wrote:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
> >
> > > > Well, you seem to have a problem with the term 'marraige' being redefined.
> > >
> > > [EUREKA!] Really, is it {that} obscure what I'm arguing?
> >
> > John, we all understand what you're arguing. We just disagree with you.
>
> You know what, in my crazier moments I'd be happy to leave the definition of
> "marriage" to whatever non governmental sanctioning bodies wanted to sanction
> it, and they can define it however [they] like. As part of that leaving I'd
> then go through with a big red pen and change every single occurance of the
> word marriage in the entire body of US law to a different term. "Relationship
> contract" for example, I dunno. I'm not really attached to the word Marriage
> per se.
<snip>
>
> So for that reason, until these imposers of unjust morality are [stopped]
> once and for all (and I think the Founding Fathers think they [did] just
> that, regrettably, and I think they'd be dismayed to see how it has
> unraveled), I am not ready to cede control of the term Marriage. Instead I'll
> fight for its expansion to include all valid relationship arrangements.
I agree with everything Larry stated. Oh if wished made it so...
I think Larry should change his name to Dave and become part of the Davish 5
Though there is a Larry David in teh world--mayhaps Larry's middle name is
Dave...
Dave K
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
200 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
