To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 24991
24990  |  24992
Subject: 
Re: polygyny in "biblical times"
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 22 Jul 2004 10:50:40 GMT
Viewed: 
1330 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Allister McLaren wrote:
  
Shameless diversion aside, I agree. Let’s get back to biblical principles. How many wives and concubines did Soloman have again?

This is very OT (excuse the pun); for a NT ref see Matthew 25:1-12: “...the kingdom of heaven be likened unto ten virgins, which took their lamps, and went forth to meet the bridegroom....” ;)

Why don’t you leave the exogesis of the Bible to those who know what they are talking about (as you obviously don’t).

If you’d read the header & not snipped quite so much text, you’d see I was talking about polygyny in NT “biblical times”; what are you talking about?

Scott A

  
  
  
Relevance? (as if polygamy was a “biblical principle”).

(I think you mean polygyny).

The point is moot, to Christians at least. Jesus’ teaching on the subject is clear, as He quotes from Genesis (capitalized):

“And He answered and said, “Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE, and said, FOR THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER AND BE JOINED TO HIS WIFE, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH’? “So they are no longer two, but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate.” Matthew 19:4-6

JOHN



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: polygyny in "biblical times"
 
(...) The "ten virgins" are bridesmaids for the bride, not whatever you seemed to be implying (polygyny). Or were you just making some throw-away joke? JOHN (20 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: polygyny in "biblical times"
 
(...) Why don't you leave the exogesis of the Bible to those who know what they are talking about (as you obviously don't). (...) The point is moot, to Christians at least. Jesus' teaching on the subject is clear, as He quotes from Genesis (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

200 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR