Debate : 24862

Off-Topic / Debate / 24862

24861 | 24863

Subject:	Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Mon, 19 Jul 2004 16:11:31 GMT
Viewed:	4210 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote: > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote: <snip> > Also, your eager embrace of animals in this context is an attempt to blur the > issue. You must first establish that animals are able to enter into legally > binding contracts. Once you have done this, then I will discuss the more > specific issue of human/animal marital contracts. > > > You are merely trading one discriminated group for another. > > How so? > > Dave! It's amazing that I just agreed with everything that was stated by Dave! You cannot have sexual discrimination in laws. A law forbidding same-sex marriage is sexual discrimination and takes away rights from individuals. Dave K

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution
(...) Ever tried to use the women's restroom? Or do you advocate unisex bathrooms? JOHN (22 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution
(...) My objection is to the use of the terms "activist judge" or "judicial activism" as short-hand subsitutions for actual debate. Too often Conservative pundits have decried judicial rulings as "activist" without presenting any legitimate (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

200 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact