Subject:
|
Re: Question for the Conservatives out there
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 14 Jul 2004 04:46:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1754 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote:
|
| |
| |
K, Canada is assimilated by the US--
Can I run for Prez?
Is being ‘born in the US’ retroactive for Canadians if Canada becomes 51-64
states?
|
Yes, but in your case, we’d make an exception;-D
|
I disagree. David K is eminently qualified to be Prez, after all, he’s a
faithful West Wing watcher. That right there makes him more qualified than our
current incumbent (who I suspect may not be able to turn televisions on without
assistance)...
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Question for the Conservatives out there
|
| (...) He is??? ;-) Hmmm, is "TV watcher" considered a qualification for the presidency by Libertarians? I see that employment isn't;-) (...) You know, that's not as easy as it sounds these days. I don't watch much TV, but when I am at a friend's (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | Re: Question for the Conservatives out there
|
| (...) K, so Dave K's Prez.. SecState would be... I'd say Larry (or John, I'm still debating that) SecDef would be Bruce (cause I like his style about dealing with foreign peeps) Who else... Who knows anything about agriculture? Dave K (20 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
218 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
