To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 24716
24715  |  24717
Subject: 
Re: We'll take in your poor, your homeless, your oppressed...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 9 Jul 2004 08:35:36 GMT
Viewed: 
1088 times
  
  Churchill took a Just stand without one shot
being fired at the Brits.  Long term he did the right thing 'cause Hitler wasn't
going to stop with Poland.  And what gave Germany, as a sovereign naiton, the
right to invade Poland in the first place?

What gave them the right to stop him (not that they did)?

Britain and France had a treaty with Poland which guaranteed its territorial
integrity.

A {much} overlooked point is that the USSR invaded Poland a week or two after
Nazi Germany did. We did not declare war on them as Churchill hoped the USSR
would turn against Nazi Germany. In the end, the opposite happened.... and the
rest is history.

Scott A

You are going down an
avenue that ultimately shoots down the "sovereign nation can do what it wants"
so I don't mind this line at all.




Message is in Reply To:
  Re: We'll take in your poor, your homeless, your oppressed...
 
(...) There's only one part of your answer that matters: "No". When talking about something being "just" or "unjust", we are not talking about the power to enforce that, and I'm not addressing that at all. So, no, Saddam doesn't have the right to (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

120 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR