 | | Re: Some good news for a change, maybe? —Tim Courtney
|
| | | (...) Sorry, I can't help notice, Dave, that you left off the end of Larry's message talking about baiting. Also, I'm not sure that anyone else cares who is right, you or him, other than the two of you. I've watched the two of you get into it on (...) (20 years ago, 9-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Some good news for a change, maybe? —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | (...) Tim, many thanks for your constructive input. ;) Dave, just how intelligent do you "claim" to be? ;) Scott A (...) (20 years ago, 9-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Some good news for a change, maybe? —David Laswell
|
| | | | | | (...) Top 0.5%, based on SAT scores. (20 years ago, 9-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Some good news for a change, maybe? —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | (...) Wow. I can see why Tim feels intimidated by you! ;) Scott A (20 years ago, 10-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Some good news for a change, maybe? —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | | | (...) ROFL! -Tim (20 years ago, 10-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Some good news for a change, maybe? —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | | | (...) I don't accept SAT as a valid indicator of intelligence even though there is a statistically powerful correlation for native English speakers. But I might just be missing part of an earlier conversation... Chris (20 years ago, 10-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Some good news for a change, maybe? —Pedro Silva
|
| | | | | | (...) Out of curiosity, what are those? Pedro (20 years ago, 10-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Some good news for a change, maybe? —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) Hello, Pedro- (URL) Scholastic Aptitude Test> It is the standard test used by colleges for potential admissions. JOHN (...) (20 years ago, 10-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Some good news for a change, maybe? —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | | (...) During the first research methodology course in grad school, we were given data on the just-graduated University of Missouri students for an exercise in statistics. I found that SAT was the best predictor of college academic success for the (...) (20 years ago, 10-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Some good news for a change, maybe? —David Laswell
|
| | | | (...) Considering his history of bullying behavior towards me, here, on the MichLUG list, and especially by private e-mail (where his often inflammatory, usually hypocritical, and always condescending "suggestions" got to be of such a blatantly (...) (20 years ago, 9-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Some good news for a change, maybe? —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) This sounds familiar. Scott A (20 years ago, 10-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Some good news for a change, maybe? —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) This sounds familiar. JOHN (20 years ago, 10-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
