Subject:
|
Re: We'll take in your poor, your homeless, your oppressed...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 8 Jul 2004 19:59:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1264 times
|
| |
| |
"Larry Pieniazek" <larry.(mylastname)@ascentialsoftwareDOTcom> wrote in
message news:I0Ju05.zt6@lugnet.com...
> These are LMF answers, not my own, which are rather muddier.
>
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz wrote:
>
> > Hmm, how do you define sovereignty? Does it require consent of the people
> > and property owners covered by the claim of sovereignty?
>
> Yes, each and every one...
Ok, so an improperly formed sovereignty doesn't have any validity...
> > Who can make a
> > claim of sovereignty?
>
> Any group of people, no matter how small, whether territorial or not. At the
> extreme, it must be unanimous consent or else provision must be made to exclude
> the dissenters from the claimed sovereignty. A properly constituted LMF
> government must always allow secession by any group that wishes to leave.
Hmm, if I'm accused of a crime, can I secede and thereby escape justice?
Frank
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: We'll take in your poor, your homeless, your oppressed...
|
| These are LMF answers, not my own, which are rather muddier. (...) Yes, each and every one... (...) Any group of people, no matter how small, whether territorial or not. At the extreme, it must be unanimous consent or else provision must be made to (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
120 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|