 | | Re: We'll take in your poor, your homeless, your oppressed... —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | (...) A dodge, but I'll go with the flow: then you believe that international law supports that any nation recognized by the U.N. is free to slaughter its inhabitants at will and no intervention is just? (...) I'll lay it out to you the same way I (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: We'll take in your poor, your homeless, your oppressed... —Leonard Hoffman
|
| | | | (...) "no intervention" - the UN has repeatedly placed economic sanctions on countries for human rights abuses. "slaughter" is a loaded term. A nation has a right to defend itself from insurgents and rebels. A nation has a right to enforce its own (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: We'll take in your poor, your homeless, your oppressed... —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | (...) This does not answer my question. Because it hasn't doesn't mean it can't. (...) Or a genocide against different tribe from the ruling one? Or those of a given religion that aren't rebeling? Or a people or region that were forced into the (...) (20 years ago, 9-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
