Subject:
|
Re: Fair use and allusion?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 8 Jul 2004 16:10:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1608 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
Not controlling the flow of oil (or do you have cites for that?), but
enabling the free flow of oil to occur. And I said I didn’t want to get
into corrupt UN policies...;-)
|
John’s right. Haliburton will make it’s money just from infrastructure
contracts, the oil in this case is almost secondary.
|
Awww. “Haliburton” again????
|
Actually, it’s not Haliburton again. It’s Haliburton, still. This is
hardly an over-and-done-with matter, no matter how much Conservatives, Neo-Cons,
and the administration might wish it were.
This is worth
reading because it provides an overview of pending issues, most notably this
bit:
Vice President Dick Cheney faces criminal indictments for illegal activities
while CEO of energy giant Halliburton and also illegally intervened to secure a
$7 billion no-bid contract for his former employer after his election to office,
an analysis by the White House counsel’s office concludes.
Is the White House counsel’s office part of The Liberal Media?
Furthermore, why does a multi-billion dollar conflict-of-interest case seem less
important to Conservatives than a 30-year-old Arkansas land deal?
Dave!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Fair use and allusion?
|
| (...) Awww. "Haliburton" again???? (...) Awww. More "puppet" talk? (...) We always could, even from SH if we wanted! (...) But that is precisely my point-- OBL was acting independently from the policies of his country, so equating the nationality of (...) (20 years ago, 2-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
106 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
