 | | Re: We'll take in your poor, your homeless, your oppressed... —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | (...) Typo! This should read "wasn't legitimate" rather than was. That is, the UN hardly ever says anything bad about a government's legitimacy, compared to the number of coups. So the UN seems to see coups as (at least defacto) an OK way to change (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: We'll take in your poor, your homeless, your oppressed... —Leonard Hoffman
| | | | | | (...) This is an interesting point. But then, I'm begining to really question democracy as the most effective way of ruling a people. Sometimes coups occur because the masses make the wrong decision (ie, Musharraf taking over Pakistan to keep it (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: We'll take in your poor, your homeless, your oppressed... —Scott Arthur
| | | | | (...) What is the alternative when it is often the people in these countries which can benefit most from what the UN can provide (e.g. direct aid and peace keeping)? Scott A (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | |
