To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 24605
24604  |  24606
Subject: 
Re: Fair use and allusion?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 2 Jul 2004 03:36:04 GMT
Viewed: 
1358 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:

  
   “Not to mention that you are still using a U.N. sanction to justify actions that the U.N. itself does not sanction.” You are trying to dodge the point.

Again, I reject any uttering from the UN to be binding on the US. More impotent claptrap. What is the world going to do-- hate us more???

Oh well, I guess the US should just try to take over the whole world now - they have no more credibility to lose.

ROSCO



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Fair use and allusion?
 
(...) Fine; put it this way: there are a great deal of countries on both sides. Saying "the world clearly thinks it isn't obvious" is a gross distortion. (...) Not controlling the flow of oil (or do you have cites for that?), but enabling the free (...) (20 years ago, 2-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

106 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR