 | | Re: Some wins for freedom from the Supremes —Scott Arthur
|
| | | (...) ...meanwhile, the USA's reputation overseas nosedives. Scott A (20 years ago, 29-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Some wins for freedom from the Supremes —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) But what you don't understand is that this is an asset. Unencumbered by world regard, we can do anything, anywhere. Who's going to stop us? Chris (20 years ago, 29-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Some wins for freedom from the Supremes —Leonard Hoffman
|
| | | | | (...) I have hopes for Ralph's Son, Uri Nader -lenny (20 years ago, 29-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Some wins for freedom from the Supremes —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | (...) I see your point; I suppose I have more faith in your countrymen's self-respect. ;) Anyhow, without the support of Tony B.Liar et al it is doubtful that Bush would be in the mess he is today. The past week or so has shown that his (& the (...) (20 years ago, 29-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Some wins for freedom from the Supremes —Richard Parsons
|
| | | | (...) Mmmmmm. I think that terrorist organisations the world over probably each have something similar in their manifesto. Richard Still baldly going... (20 years ago, 30-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
