 | | Re: Some wins for freedom from the Supremes —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | (...) I don't think Bush'll be in trouble over this one. He can just smirk out of the TV at us and say that 'Merica was made safer for the three or four years that they were held illegally and that he was willing to do whatever it took. Many of my (...) (20 years ago, 29-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Some wins for freedom from the Supremes —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) ...meanwhile, the USA's reputation overseas nosedives. Scott A (20 years ago, 29-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Some wins for freedom from the Supremes —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) But what you don't understand is that this is an asset. Unencumbered by world regard, we can do anything, anywhere. Who's going to stop us? Chris (20 years ago, 29-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Some wins for freedom from the Supremes —Leonard Hoffman
|
| | | | | (...) I have hopes for Ralph's Son, Uri Nader -lenny (20 years ago, 29-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Some wins for freedom from the Supremes —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | (...) I see your point; I suppose I have more faith in your countrymen's self-respect. ;) Anyhow, without the support of Tony B.Liar et al it is doubtful that Bush would be in the mess he is today. The past week or so has shown that his (& the (...) (20 years ago, 29-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Some wins for freedom from the Supremes —Richard Parsons
|
| | | | (...) Mmmmmm. I think that terrorist organisations the world over probably each have something similar in their manifesto. Richard Still baldly going... (20 years ago, 30-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
