Subject:
|
Re: Fair use and allusion?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 25 Jun 2004 14:47:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1017 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
| |
John Neal’s seemed to
question Moore’s sincerity when Moore asserted that he is not a Democrat
and has not publicly endorsed Kerry. My intent in offering the link was to
show that not all people/organizations who oppose Bush are automatically in
support of Kerry.
|
I misunderstood what you meant by “serious” then, or you misused the word.
|
Here’s the bit in question, if I’m reading you correctly:
Stop by the website of the American Nationalist Union if you want to see some
serious, non-Democrat criticism of Dubya.
My use of “serious” in this context coincides with
this definition,
specifically 2a.
Dave!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Fair use and allusion?
|
| (...) I'd agree with this, it's not in contention. (since I am one of the members of the set of people you describe) (...) Fair enough. I took your meaning as: "to be taken seriously by others" which I think is a reasonable meaning to have taken, (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
106 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
