 | | Re: Only nations can generate patriotic pride (Re: Some good news for a change, maybe?) —Richard Parsons
| | | | (...) As per my reply to Chris I wasn't actually saying that governments should run sewerage, only that government is critically important, like sewerage is critically important. (...) I think we've got a large area of agreement on this, looking at (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | Serendipity & IBM —Scott Arthur
| | | | | | (...) Put your flag away. By chance, I read (URL) this> is my newspaper yesterday about IBM: Gypsies win right to sue IBM over role in Holocaust - In 1936 IBM set up its European "headquarters" in Geneva. The appeals court ruling said: "It does not (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Only nations can generate patriotic pride (Re: Some good news for a change, maybe?) —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | (...) OK, thanks for clearing that up. I do hope you can see why we all misinterpreted your original wording though. (...) Neither. I think a government is *capable* of acting in ways that would make me feel patriotic, and in fact the US government (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Only nations can generate patriotic pride (Re: Some good news for a change, maybe?) —Scott Arthur
| | | | | (...) It is a minor point, but I thought he was succinct: "Don't get me wrong, government is critically important (like say, a decent sewerage system), but its highest achievement is to be just a tool." It was CW's response which shaped things. If (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | |
