To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 24507
24506  |  24508
Subject: 
Re: We're here to go
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 24 Jun 2004 01:05:51 GMT
Viewed: 
2545 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> 
> > Now the X prize vehicle doesn't give you manrated orbit capability per se, it's
> > a suborbital vehicle, at least at the 3 person payload that you needed to win
> > the prize. But I'm assuming (big assumption) some stretchability with loss of
> > payload so that instead of 3 people to suborbital, you stretch the vehicle a bit
> > with what you learned and can get it to get one person in LEO instead.(1)
> 
> The above assumption is massively invalid, apparently. The velocity achieved by
> SpaceShipOne is way way too low to be stretchable to LEO by leaving a few
> passengers out. I hadn't done my homework when I posted this, and I'm perfectly
> fine with admitting it.
> 
> Elsewhere in the thread I said I believed Rutan would make a profit on the prize
> (meaning his cost was well under 10M). That's not true either, apparently,
> although it wasn't a bad guess, he's not missing by orders of magnitude...
> 
> I'm still comfortable with my 12B figure though. Even if we don't still have
> Saturn Vs around. :-)
> 
> (why did I find this post? because I had a few minutes and was digging for
> tritium references. Didn't find any yet... ;-) )

The prize does not pay for the cost of development.  SS1 is not going to go into
any kind of orbit.  Both those are from a friend of mine who works on the
project (I literally asked him those very questions a few weeks ago).

-->Bruce<--



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: We're here to go
 
(...) The above assumption is massively invalid, apparently. The velocity achieved by SpaceShipOne is way way too low to be stretchable to LEO by leaving a few passengers out. I hadn't done my homework when I posted this, and I'm perfectly fine with (...) (22 years ago, 23-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

3 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR