Subject:
|
Re: Fair use and allusion?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 21 Jun 2004 20:51:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
980 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > But further, if you have a scoundrel espousing a cause that reflects badly on
> > the cause. That's not ad hominem, it's merely an observation.
>
> Only among those who look no further than the figurehead.
Isn't that exactly what Larry is warning against? One of us is missing
something because it sounds like you (Dave!) are saying "Larry, you're wrong
because what you just said is true."
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Fair use and allusion?
|
| (...) Because you are, in the post-at-hand, dismissing causes solely because Moore supports them. You may have additional reasoning that you haven't shared here, but since it's not yet been introduced in this discussion, it's irrelevant. Although (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
106 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
