Subject:
|
Re: Gay Marriage
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 18 Jun 2004 17:27:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2630 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Thomas Stangl wrote:
>
> > Again, I don't see a problem with this, as long as the family unit as a
> > whole is pulling their fair share of the insurance burden for the insurance
> > company/public at large.
>
> And that's all a matter for the individual insurance companies to work out with
> their customers, right?
Absent regulation preventing them from doing so, yes.
However, in the world today insurance companies are heavily regulated as to who
they can or can't cover and how they go about determining risk factors or
premiums.
So, no. Unfortunately.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
218 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
