To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 24113
24112  |  24114
Subject: 
Re: From Richard: "It's all bad news - Chaos is my fault"
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 28 May 2004 18:43:31 GMT
Viewed: 
1661 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Don Heyse wrote:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Parsons wrote:

<snip>

Richard
Still baldly going...

Now this is why I hang out here..

Very nicely stated, Richard.

Hmmm, I thought it was a bit long winded and sort of lost track at
the per capita part.  In my politically incorrect world it seems a
large part of the problem is those darned capitas.  The third world
produces so many of them it messes up the whole per thing.  In first
world public school we were beaten senseless with the "no more than 2.1
per" mantra.  But following that rule in the first world, and not in
the 3rd leads to an even greater imbalance between the per capitas.
I think that's the real reason for all the really nasty problems, but
I don't know how to fix it.

Well, part of the reason that people in third-world nations have 10 kids is
because 80% of those kids will likely die before puberty.  Obviously that's not
an inviolable statistic, and just as obviously it's not the only cause of skewed
population growth, but it's a big factor.  As a remedy, we first world nations
should probably consider other forms of aid than abstinence-based education.

Further, if first world nations faced a similar youth-based mortality rate, then
we'd see a revision of the 2.1 rule.

Dave!



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: From Richard: "It's all bad news - Chaos is my fault"
 
(...) You don't actually have to look to the 3rd world to see the problem. It exists in your own backyard. The have-nots everywhere seem to reproduce faster. The imbalance will always exist, maybe it's programmed into our genes. You can bicker over (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: From Richard: "It's all bad news - Chaos is my fault"
 
(...) Hi. 80% mortality? Not likely. In fact, the opposite is true; that's what's helping the problem of overpopulation along. The real pushing force is the *labor value* of children; in agricultural societies--or, better put, societies that still (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: From Richard: "It's all bad news - Chaos is my fault"
 
(...) There is a negative correlation between the average family size and the per capita GDP (or any of a number of other economic maturity indicators), in that as GDP goes up, people have less children. This is attributed to the shift away from (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: From Richard: "It's all bad news - Chaos is my fault"
 
(...) Hmmm, I thought it was a bit long winded and sort of lost track at the per capita part. In my politically incorrect world it seems a large part of the problem is those darned capitas. The third world produces so many of them it messes up the (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

163 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR