Subject:
|
Re: From Richard: "It's all bad news - Chaos is my fault"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 28 May 2004 18:43:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1661 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Don Heyse wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Parsons wrote:
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > > Richard
> > > Still baldly going...
> >
> > Now this is why I hang out here..
> >
> > Very nicely stated, Richard.
>
> Hmmm, I thought it was a bit long winded and sort of lost track at
> the per capita part. In my politically incorrect world it seems a
> large part of the problem is those darned capitas. The third world
> produces so many of them it messes up the whole per thing. In first
> world public school we were beaten senseless with the "no more than 2.1
> per" mantra. But following that rule in the first world, and not in
> the 3rd leads to an even greater imbalance between the per capitas.
> I think that's the real reason for all the really nasty problems, but
> I don't know how to fix it.
Well, part of the reason that people in third-world nations have 10 kids is
because 80% of those kids will likely die before puberty. Obviously that's not
an inviolable statistic, and just as obviously it's not the only cause of skewed
population growth, but it's a big factor. As a remedy, we first world nations
should probably consider other forms of aid than abstinence-based education.
Further, if first world nations faced a similar youth-based mortality rate, then
we'd see a revision of the 2.1 rule.
Dave!
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
163 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|