To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 24011
24010  |  24012
Subject: 
Re: Losing hearts and minds - Chaos in occupied Africa (aka something that floats)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 25 May 2004 21:38:24 GMT
Viewed: 
392 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Don Heyse wrote:
I'm almost at a loss for words.

  http://news.independent.co.uk/world/africa/story.jsp?story=524674

At a time when the world's opinion was with the UN for their stance of
the Iraqi situation, those stupid <insert expletive here> go do what
they did.

   Unfortunately, as with soldierly misconduct at Abu Ghraib,
   nobody knows how far up the proverbial food chain this goes.
   There is not yet any evidence that it was anyone but the
   soldiers involved in peacekeeping themselves; I find it very
   interesting, however, that it's the Moroccans and Uruguayans
   being singled out by this accusation.  One wonders if it's
   really just them, or if it's some of the other, more European
   peacekeepers as well.

I don't swear much, but this just makes me seething with anger.  13
year old children for crying out loud.

   Here's the kicker:  this kind of thing was *common practice*
   during the colonial era, when those partaking were Belgians,
   Britons, and French instead of UN soldiers.  Yeah, it should
   make you seethe with anger, but not because it's new--rather,
   because it's 2004 and it's happening again.  The very worst
   part is that the situation is so very bad that girls are taking
   *their own initiative* to sell their bodies--which, beyond its
   own horrific nature, points to a whole bevy of terrors that
   are only hinted at in the story, terrors that only began
   with war and dislocation.

If I was a passionate man, I'd say pull out the UN forces and drop a
few really big bombs down on their heads and 'turn the sand to glass'

   But then, that punishes the guilty as well as the innocent,
   and until you know how far up the guilt goes, it might let
   some of the guilty go free.  But the guilty may get their own
   punishment; the prevalence of HIV in the refugee camps is
   sky-high, and most carriers do not know they have it, nor
   would they jeopardize their income even if they did.

   Sad as it is, this is how the third world often "functions".
   This kind of thing is extremely prevalent outside the DRC as
   well--witness the very well-known examples of Asian "sex tours"
   where European and American businessmen pay big money to sleep
   with young girls (and boys).  It's disgusting, and it only
   operates because of exactly the same dynamic in operation
   here.  If this story made you angry, then you may burst into
   flames if you find out much more about what goes on out there.
   The primary culprit behind most of them, unfortunately, is
   the global economy of which you and I are the "haves"--the
   beneficiaries.

   Welcome to the twenty-first century.  Please leave your
   conscience at the door, as management is not responsible for
   any damage it may sustain.

And now the conspiracy theorists are out in full force, spinning this
atrocity--'This was only printed to distract us from the atrocities
comitted by the US forces in Iraq.!"  Hey look you guys with foil
wraps on your head--if it wasn't them, it would have been someone
else.

   Actually, I look at it the other way; someone down there may
   in fact have been *inspired* by the whistleblower example at
   Abu Ghraib, and decided to stand up for what is morally and
   legally right.  I hope the story of how this was discovered,
   and who was willing to stand up and be counted, comes out.

See, it's the mentality--when you are born into and taught your entire
lives that the 'displaced people' are 'less than you', you can commit
these heinous acts of barbarism and not even remotely consider that
you're doing something wrong.

   It's the power relationship granted by wealth and status
   over the powerless.  In fact it may have little to do with
   what they were taught "their entire lives" but what the
   situation brought out in its exigencies.  We've seen in the
   last few months very, very stark evidence of what can happen
   to otherwise level-headed people in extreme circumstances.

   And if they are Moroccans and Uruguayans--themselves usually
   categorized as "colonized people"--it's even *more* bizarre.

Do I have an solution?  Do I have an answer?  I know that the UN has
mismanaged this fiasco from the beginning, and every shred of evidence
points to this mismanagement eminating from Kofi's administration.
But what to do now?  Now it's a totally differnt ball-game.  We see
the 'enemy' for what he really is--a spiteful, vengeful group of
people who have *no* consideration for people who aren't them.  The DRC
isn't the issue.  The DRC folks probably just want to go about their
daily business and be left alone and let 'the powers that be' go do
something else.  But these extreme socialist zealots who believe
only they have the answers to all the worlds problems... that's an
entirely different matter.

   Now you're getting kind of weird, here.  Black-helicopter
   weird, in fact.  You are aware of what happened in the DRC
   before the UN showed up, and even when it was first there
   (but before there were significant numbers of people on the
   ground), right?  Just as people are wrong to point fingers
   at the United States as a jackbooted racist terror state for
   the actions of a few brutalizers, to scream that the UN is an
   imperial, "extreme socialist zealot" (why don't you just say
   "communist" and get it over with?) rapacious entity because
   of this matter is more than a little silly.  Wait and watch
   it unfold before deploying the questionable conclusions to
   impugn the whole UN.

   You might also want to learn just what the socioeconomic
   situation in the entire "underdeveloped world" is like,
   so you can see just how unremarkable most aspects of this
   are save one: that anyone ever found out about it.  That
   part may in fact be something you can *credit* to the UN,
   because if it had been a less accountable force it would
   have been disturbingly easy to cover this up.

   best

   LFB



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Losing hearts and minds - Chaos in occupied Africa (aka something that floats)
 
(...) Sorry about that. I sorta borrowed the words. I don't write very well myself and those words just screamed righteous indignation at me in their original context, even though I couldn't fathom the reasoning behind them. I guess I got a bit lost (...) (20 years ago, 26-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Losing hearts and minds - Chaos in occupied Africa (aka something that floats)
 
I'm almost at a loss for words. (URL) At a time when the world's opinion was with the UN for their stance of the Iraqi situation, those stupid <insert expletive here> go do what they did. I don't swear much, but this just makes me seething with (...) (20 years ago, 25-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

4 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR