 | | Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
|
|
(...) What!?! I missed that episode! Dang, at least that part of her is real...no, don't tell me if it isn't... -->Bruce<-- (21 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
|
|
(...) (21 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote: <snip> (...) She's the 'daily hottie' today, coincidence of coincidences... (URL) be a PG-13 rating on that site--no nudity but some verrry nice pics from the likes of Maxim--so if ya don't like to (...) (21 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
|
|
(...) Of course, there's absolutely no way to implement that policy effectively, or to police it credibly, unless we have a clear, precise, and consistent definition of what qualifies as pornography. Who would care to posit such a definition? (...) (21 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
|
|
(...) I knew I should have checked my spelling on that - I've been spoiled by the "edit" feature on Classic-Castle. -->Bruce<-- (21 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
