Subject:
|
Re: Of some interest.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 29 Mar 2004 10:44:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
183 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
| |
Here’s yet another example of one of Dubya’s not-quite-a-lie prevarications:
had my administration had any information that terrorists were going to
attack New York City on Sept. 11, we would have acted,” Bush said.
No kidding. And if it’s later found out that Dubya knew for certain that Al
Qaeda intended to destroy the WTC in September, he can afterwards claim
“Well, I never claimed that we didn’t know Al Qaeda would attack the WTC at
some point in September, but we were correct in claiming that we had no
information that Al Qaeda would attack New York City itself on exactly
September 11.” This is the kind of stinking, dishonest rhetoric that causes
people to hate Dubya. He claims to be a moral leader with integrity, but we
have yet to see him demonstrate either morality or integrity.
|
I must admit to thinking the exact same thing. You should listen to some of
Blair’s(1) pronouncements; he goes to great lengths to not to tell a lie. What
makes it worse is that he is quite unashamed about it.
I expect both Bush & Blair just exploiting the sound bite hungry media.
Scott A
(1) AKA Tony B.Liar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Of some interest
|
| (URL) yet another example of one of Dubya's not-quite-a-lie prevarications: had my administration had any information that terrorists were going to attack New York City on Sept. 11, we would have acted," Bush said. No kidding. And if it's later (...) (21 years ago, 26-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
