 | | Re: Bush defends exclusion order on contracts
|
|
(...) Depends if the old CEO is responsible for bringing the company to its knees. Often when companies go into receivership the creditors receive a miniscule portion of what is owed. But generally those creditors are not barred from helping to (...) (22 years ago, 15-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Bush Down Plays Need for Plan (on Deficit)
|
|
From Reuters: ((URL) ) - quote - When asked about the U.S. dollar's fall in value and market concerns about the deficit, Bush said: "We certainly need to send a signal to the capital markets that we're going to maintain spending discipline." - end (...) (22 years ago, 15-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Geneva Convention
|
|
(...) Why indeed. Sorry. :-0 Scott A Have you had a look at Arthurs Seat Yet? (2 URLs) (...) (22 years ago, 15-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Geneva Convention
|
|
(...) I don't believe it belongs in .general either. I imagine it was an honest mistake, not a deliberate attempt to stir up controversy or circumvent the topic guidelines, although I could be wrong. LUGNET doesn't enable you to just pick up a post (...) (22 years ago, 15-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Bush defends exclusion order on contracts
|
|
(...) Who else should pay it. When a company gets a new CEO, does its debt usually get wiped? (...) That may be a reason for some *individuals* to appose the invasion. However, it does not explain the millions across the world who opposed the war; (...) (22 years ago, 15-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
