To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 22936
22935  |  22937
Subject: 
Bush defends exclusion order on contracts
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 02:02:56 GMT
Viewed: 
253 times
  
http://sify.com/news/fullstory.php?id=13332930

"It is very simple. Our people risk their lives. Friendly coalition folks risk
their lives. And, therefore, the contracting is going to reflect that. And that
is what the US taxpayers expect,"

Surprise, surprise, the invasion was more about control than terrorism.

And then:

http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2003/s1008494.htm

"...after barring major European countries from bidding for the most lucrative
reconstruction contracts in Iraq, President Bush is now asking those same
countries for help in forgiving Iraq's debt."

Is that incredible optimism, incredibly bad timing, incredible arrogance, or
incredible stupidity?

ROSCO



Message has 5 Replies:
  Re: Bush defends exclusion order on contracts
 
(...) This is an interesting question in the macro-sense: can the debts of a government that is overthrown be collected, especially if that government was corrupt and engaged in wholesale theft of its nation's resources? Is it comparable to a (...) (21 years ago, 12-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
  Re: Bush defends exclusion order on contracts
 
(...) Mmmmmm. I understand that these conditions (who may supply under these contracts) are in respect of the aid money being provided by the US. It would not be unheard of for donors to impose these sorts of conditions when giving money. I guess (...) (21 years ago, 12-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Bush defends exclusion order on contracts
 
Hmm. One would think that open competitive bids would be in the best interests of US tax payers and Iraq citizens? Heard the latest: (URL) Oil firm 'overcharged' US in Iraq> Scott A (...) (21 years ago, 12-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
  Re: Bush defends exclusion order on contracts
 
I liked this: (URL) Scott A (21 years ago, 12-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
  Re: Bush defends exclusion order on contracts
 
(...) I'm not really surprised are you. (...) Wait why would Iraq have a debt? Saddam's regime had a debt but what does that have to do with Iraq? Of course that is the only reason certain countries opposed military action in the first place. (...) (...) (21 years ago, 15-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

12 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR