To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 22907
22906  |  22908
Subject: 
Re: Babes Against Bush
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 9 Dec 2003 16:41:12 GMT
Viewed: 
355 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote:

Anywho, 'Babes' are rallying against Dubya--and here's their 99 reasons thus
far


74. Thanksgiving visit forced soldiers to eat turkey "dinner" at 7:00 am
local time.

99. Forced troops in Baghdad to eat Thanksgiving "dinner" at 6:00 a.m.

[HEAR HEAR!!! THE INJUSTICE OF IT ALL! RUN HIM OUT ON A RAIL!]

(BTW, which was it? 0600 or 0700?)

[JOHN]

I'm a big fan of sarcasm for whatever strange reason...

That said--see, there's this problem I've always had, and I'll dredge up two
examples...

In Star Trek:TMP, Kirk is talking to Decker about why Kirk was put in charge of
the mission (getting the 'cap'ns chair and all that')

He says, "My experience with dealing with the unknown... (few other things that
I forget).." and last he says "My familiarity with the ship"

At which point Decker jumps in and says "Well, the ship's been completely
refitted!" as if that one refutation of one  point on Kirks list negates the
entire  arguement.

This isn't math class, in which one wrong addition leads to a wrong answer--it's
a list--not a sequence of events.

So the other example is the OJ trial (not to bring that up again), but here's a
rather large *list* of why evidence points to OJ, and negating one or two points
does not negate the entire list.

So trivialize the turkey dinner.  It was a trivial point in the grande list of
points as to why I believe Dubya should, indeed, be "run out on a rail".

If Richard were here, he'd have some witty comment.  Alas, it is only I, and,
for myself,  99 points--I'd like to see 99 refutions.  Heck--I'd like to see one
refutation of *any* point, but over the past 3 years, nada.  Just more factless
rhetoric.

As we say on earth, "C'est la vie!"

Dave K
-"OMG, Bubba smoked that cigar!  We should run him out on a rail!"



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Babes Against Bush
 
(...) HEAR HEAR!!! THE INJUSTICE OF IT ALL! RUN HIM OUT ON A RAIL! (BTW, which was it? 0600 or 0700?) JOHN (21 years ago, 9-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

3 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR