| | Re: Dubya's propaganda machine at work again John Neal
|
| | (...) Coincidence. No? (...) The man is obviously an idiot. JOHN (21 years ago, 18-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | |
| | | | Re: Dubya's propaganda machine at work again Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) Probably, but it's good for a punchline. Much has already (and not unreasonably) been made of the rhetorical similarity between Dubya's "with-us-or-against-us" drum-beating and the propaganda of 1930's German fascism. If Dubya ever mentions a (...) (21 years ago, 18-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | Re: Dubya's propaganda machine at work again Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) Yeah, and Bush is some sort of intellectual? "Red Ken" is a bit of a character who enjoys playing to the crowd. However, he has been elected to represent the people of London. Who has bush been elected to represent? Scott A PS Bush is now in (...) (21 years ago, 19-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Dubya's propaganda machine at work again John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Non-sequitur. (...) I take that as the UK PC way of calling him a stupid git? (...) Time to get another joke book-- that one is a wee old. I wonder how many Londoners feel justly represented by his puerile comments? JOHN (21 years ago, 20-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |