To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 22702
22701  |  22703
Subject: 
Re: Uh-oh, Bad News for Bald One
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 30 Oct 2003 16:55:01 GMT
Viewed: 
217 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Parsons wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti wrote:
   ...following his own moral compass... http://thebricktestament.com/the_law/following_your_own_moral_compass/dt29_19.html
If, as the Good Book says, the laws are written on the hearts of man, I’ll take my chances following my heart rather than some clergyman’s ideas.

If the church’s number one priority at this time is debating ‘women in office’ (CRC), debating ordaining homosexuals (United) or fixing priestly indiscretions (Catholocism), I’ll “march to my own drummer”, thank you.

I do like this particular story. I’m content with the probability that there are supreme beings who are to us as we are to ants. But I have a problem accepting a being as worthy of worship who destroys those whose capacity is so much less and who do not agree. It would be like me stepping on an ant that disagreed with me. Amusing perhaps, but hardly worthy of worship.

I am a big fan of the personal moral compass. For some, that might coincide with some old book, and that’s cool. If it doesn’t coincide with some old book, or with my personal moral compass, that’s entirely cool too.

But regardless of one’s compass, one acts, and there are always consequences. A deep understanding of consequences is a good way to calibrate one’s moral compass, no?

(And surely only the media truly believes that the various churches are primarily focussed on the three issues noted. As I understand it, like most organisations, the churches are primarily focussed on self preservation. Alright, so that last comment was facetious. Probably :-)


For me, I try to work on a cohesive and comprehensive ‘moral compass’ in which you do what you can, don’t sweat the stuff you can’t, and try to understand the difference.

That about it in a very tightly wrapped nutshell.

If you get ‘yer knickers in a knot’ over every little thing, the stress’ll kill ya and you’ll be rendered inoperative to help fix things.

If you don’t care about anything, then why bother living--what’s the point?

So some days I’ll pick up garbage along the road and some days I’ll play EQ.

Dave K
-sometimes you can take a day off from moral accountability; when you are tired of fighting some battles, count on your friends to fight them for you
- Dan, Sports Night



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Uh-oh, Bad News for Bald One
 
(...) (URL) (...) I do like this particular story. I'm content with the probability that there are supreme beings who are to us as we are to ants. But I have a problem accepting a being as worthy of worship who destroys those whose capacity is so (...) (21 years ago, 30-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

4 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR