 | | Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
|
|
(...) I'm with Kooties in that you are not likely to like my answer either. And I am likely to be further marginalized by "uber-pagan" types like Bruce. Keeping in mind that I reject most organized religions out of hand as obviously politically (...) (22 years ago, 29-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The partisian trap in California
|
|
(...) Hmmmmm. As a friend pointed out to me "210 messages in that thread, and not a single one about who to vote for before the elections, hmmmmm id say people are more concerned about things they have no control or influence over than those they (...) (22 years ago, 28-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
|
|
(...) Well, you won't like my answer then. Being a pretty big fan of science, but only managing to fluff in trying to get a BA, I consider myself a 'pseudo-sciece guy'. Which means I get the general concepts, adn can see how things work and all, but (...) (22 years ago, 28-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: recognise yourself here?
|
|
(...) This is the same way I signed in one of the previous threads on this topic, that's all. (riffing on the fact that I said it's been brought up before for the benefit of long time readers) I have not tried to exhaustively see how many different (...) (22 years ago, 28-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: recognise yourself here?
|
|
(...) You forgot (reformed?) Duelist. En garde! Or did I just open myself up for a riposte? :-) -->Bruce<-- (smart-alec and devil's advocate) (22 years ago, 28-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
