To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 22646
22645  |  22647
Subject: 
Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 27 Oct 2003 20:43:57 GMT
Viewed: 
834 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
   I like that proof just fine, but when I’ve presented it here before (in prior discussions) it’s usually been dismissed off-handedly in terms of “His mysterious purpose” or the like.

Yeah, that’s straight from the mouth of Elihu in the Book of Job. Elihu says God “was angry at Job because he justified himself rather than God” (Job 32.2): “God is greater than man. Why do you contend against him?” (Job 33.12-13).

God even makes an appearance, speaking from the whirlwind: “Who is this that darkens counsel by words without knowledge?” (Job 38.2). Then God attacks Job for daring to question the nature of evil and of God: “Gird up your loins like a man, I will question you, and you shall declare to me. Where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth? Tell me, if you have understanding. Who determined its measurements - surely you know! Or who stretched the line upon it? On what were its bases sunk, or who laid its cornerstone, when the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?” (Job 38.3-7)

The arguments in the Book of Job rest heavily on God’s mysteriousness and absolute authority: evil exists because God wills it and its existence is not for us to question. The competing viewpoints presented in the Book of Job suggest that the rational process of debate is not capable of addressing the issues involved in developing an understanding of the problem of evil or of conprehending the nature of the divine.

Any believer can just point to the Book of Job and assert: I don’t have to be rational about God, it says so right here...

-- Hop-Frog



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
 
(...) I like that proof just fine, but when I've presented it here before (in prior discussions) it's usually been dismissed off-handedly in terms of "His mysterious purpose" or the like. For variety's sake, I thought that I'd try this perfect = (...) (21 years ago, 27-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

220 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR