Subject:
|
Re: Voluntary, private discrimination (Was: Disparicies in Sentencing)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 15 Sep 1999 13:54:38 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpieniazek@novera&SayNoToSpam&.com
|
Viewed:
|
1900 times
|
| |
|
|
OK, who "lost"(1) this debate? Scott because he officially said the word
"Nazi" first, or Sproat, who mentioned "Nurenburg Defense" which,
although it does not explicitly contain the word, is clearly related?
If it wasn't Sproat (judges, do we have a ruling?) does he get style
points for inciting Scott to go out of bounds, or does he get an
admonition for flagrant provocation?
<BIG HUGE GRIN>
Now see... THIS would be fun to debate. All that murder stuff is just
too unfun...
1 - under defacto Usenet rules which say that the first person to
mention Nazis or Hitler automatically loses a debate, no matter what the
topic. :-)
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ Member ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to
lugnet.
NOTE: I have left CTP, effective 18 June 99, and my CTP email
will not work after then. Please switch to my Novera ID.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
276 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
