To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 22248
22247  |  22249
Subject: 
The partisian trap in California
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 3 Oct 2003 23:17:28 GMT
Viewed: 
235 times
  
I haven't seen this discussed here so I thought I would bring it up.

On Wednesday the LA Times launched a huge hit piece against Schwarzenegger, with
four negative articles including a front page story about Arnold's alleged
indiscressions. It should come as no suprise that Republicans quickly began to
dismiss these alligations as minor, unsubstantiated, and politically motivated,
while Democrats (especially leftist womens groups) jumped all over Arnold as
unfit to govern based on these bahaviors.

The funny twist to this whole thing is that both sides are trapped by their
stances during the Clinton impeachment. How can a Democrat condem Arnold for
sexual indiscressions, when they unquestioningly supported Clinton, inspite of
sexual harrassment and rape charges. On the other hand how can Republicans shrug
off these serious charges when they actively persecuted Bill for simmilar
offenses. I think the justifications for the duality of their support are truely
comedic.

Personally I find both of their actions deplorable, and indefensible. If I did
not have a tremedous fear that Cruz "Tax 'em when they're down" Bustamante might
win I would likely change my vote. I also hope the LA Times is unable to succeed
in their attempts to influence this election in a biased manor.

Although I am aware that California politics do not affect all of you, I am
curious as to peoples opinions on this matter, and the resultant hypocricy on
both sides of the asile.

Scott C.



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: The partisian trap in California
 
Scott: I might be one of the few people that might respond to this, so I will. But in reality this subject is just a sideshow. Sadly, this probably has at least a little to do with the way many Californians are going to vote the way they will next (...) (21 years ago, 4-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
  Re: The partisian trap in California
 
(...) Eeeet izzz trash poh-lo-teecs! Und I vish to ahh-poh-lo-gize to the vemmen I hoff fon-dohld. Sieg Heil, mein Fuhrer! I can valk! Heck, even Ahhhnuld has a Strangelovian two-minded reaction to the charges (and I got to sneak in an oblique (...) (21 years ago, 4-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: The partisian trap in California
 
(...) Hmmmmm. As a friend pointed out to me "210 messages in that thread, and not a single one about who to vote for before the elections, hmmmmm id say people are more concerned about things they have no control or influence over than those they (...) (21 years ago, 28-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

220 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR