 | | Re: Finally some church/state mingling that I can really get behind! —Dave Schuler
|
| | | (...) And what, exactly, does it do for us? If charity is performed to achieve a space in heaven, then it's a simple economic transaction designed to favor oneself with a payoff disproportionate to the act of charity. (...) On the contrary--public (...) (21 years ago, 13-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Finally some church/state mingling that I can really get behind! —Carl Nelson
|
| | | | | (...) Generosity makes us better people (at least in my code of values--if it doesn't in yours then there's nothing but for us to agree to disagree). If our "generosity" is fueled only by a desire to earn a space in heaven, we are buying, not (...) (21 years ago, 13-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Finally some church/state mingling that I can really get behind! —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | (...) But that just postpones the argument, rather than resolving it. (I continue this point below.) (...) Here we may be at a crux of our disagreement. Why doesn't the public good qualify as charity? Are there circumstances under which it might (...) (21 years ago, 13-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Finally some church/state mingling that I can really get behind! —Carl Nelson
|
| | | | | | (...) The key word is "wealthy benefactor;" it's charity because a person has decided to do something of no advantage to himself or herself that does enormous good to others. It's also not charity by proxy; it's charity at an individual level. I (...) (21 years ago, 13-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Finally some church/state mingling that I can really get behind! —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | (...) Et tu, Dave!? This is the same "love it or leave it" crap that one normally hears from the right. It is also a straw man, there is of course the alternative of simply staying and trying to "improve" the system. Improve is in quotes because one (...) (21 years ago, 13-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Finally some church/state mingling that I can really get behind! —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) Hey, you stinker--I've told you before that if you don't actually agree with me, you're supposed to pretend that you do. And anyway, I don't use strawman arguments--my fallacy was the false dilemma, thankyouverymuch. 8^) Anyway, I didn't quite (...) (21 years ago, 13-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
