 | | Re: 22/7 & infinities (was: Re: The nature of the JC god, good or evil?) —John Neal
|
| | | <FHrMEp.Et3@lugnet.com> <FHssu0.zJ@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit David Eaton wrote: <snip Dave and John discussion of basis of morality, logic (...) (25 years ago, 13-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: 22/7 & infinities (was: Re: The nature of the JC god, good or evil?) —John DiRienzo
|
| | | | | John Neal wrote in message <37DC9866.54DFFFBB@u...st.net>... (...) x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" (...) want to (...) fundamental. (...) pleasureable and (...) even (...) another one (...) This (...) of (...) and (...) me; does (...) instinct (...) (...) (25 years ago, 13-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 22/7 & infinities (was: Re: The nature of the JC god, good or evil?) —David Eaton
|
| | | | | | (...) Like I said to John N, I'd say they're both encompassed by what we want. The idea I was trying to present was "we want *something*, and to get that something is good". That's the fundamental emotion. That something can encompass both the (...) (25 years ago, 13-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: 22/7 & infinities (was: Re: The nature of the JC god, good or evil?) —David Eaton
|
| | | | (...) Well, I'd classify that under what I said, actually... I was trying to pick out the root desire-- And I'd certainly qualify living as one of the things we want. Another way to look at it is that happiness presupposes survival. We can't easily (...) (25 years ago, 13-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
