Subject:
|
Re: Latter Day Saints (was:Re: God and the Devil and forgiveness (was Re: POV-RAY orange color))
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 8 Sep 1999 09:21:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3693 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote
> Moz (Chris Moseley) wrote:
> > same reason that I don't fear that Larry will kill me and attempt to
> > buy off my next of kin. Doing so fits his moral outlook [1],
> but THIS is so outrageous that I have to ask where on earth this notion
> comes from...
Your comment that you have the right to speed because you can afford to
compensate my family should you kill me. You became silent when I asked
whether I could refuse to sell the item in question. I regard deliberate
negligance resulting in death as murder, for reasons I trust are clear.
> Please demonstrate a derivation from my first priniciple
Some of your positions are not compatible with that principle. Speeding
is one of them, unless you take a peculiar view of your obligations to
those around you.
> .... but I think you're sufficiently detatched from what I've been
> saying that you have no idea what my principles are or what derives from
> them.
Perhaps I just interpret what you say according to my worldview and not
yours. As most people do :)
Moz
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
277 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
