Subject:
|
Re: What's worse--being a moron or being corrupt?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 9 May 2003 04:39:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
103 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:
> So a Canadian Parliamentary aide called Dubya a 'moron' a while back, and
> that sent everyone into a tizzy.
>
> Now the Mayor of London says Dubya's corrupt:
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/3011999.stm
>
> Which would you rather be--labeled as a moron or labeled corrupt?
I would say being labeled a moron is far better than being labeled corrupt.
>
> I, like the mayor of London, would love to see the day when Dubya's
> overthrown.
Why stop with Dubya? We should get rid of the whole lot and reinstate the
constitution as our basis of government. (You know where everyone follows the
same "rules" regardless of wealth and/or "political power")
> However, I personally don't think it'll happen 'cause of all
> the apathy that abounds concerning Dubya's transgressions.
>
> So 'moron' will have to do.
>
> Dave K
-Mike Petrucelli
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | What's worse--being a moron or being corrupt?
|
| So a Canadian Parliamentary aide called Dubya a 'moron' a while back, and that sent everyone into a tizzy. Now the Mayor of London says Dubya's corrupt: (URL) would you rather be--labeled as a moron or labeled corrupt? I, like the mayor of London, (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
