Debate : 20819


Off-Topic / Debate / 20819	20818 \| 20820

Subject:	What's worse--being a moron or being corrupt?
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Thu, 8 May 2003 18:14:33 GMT
Viewed:	92 times

So a Canadian Parliamentary aide called Dubya a 'moron' a while back, and that sent everyone into a tizzy. Now the Mayor of London says Dubya's corrupt: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/3011999.stm Which would you rather be--labeled as a moron or labeled corrupt? I, like the mayor of London, would love to see the day when Dubya's overthrown. However, I personally don't think it'll happen 'cause of all the apathy that abounds concerning Dubya's transgressions. So 'moron' will have to do. Dave K

Message has 3 Replies:

		Re: What's worse--being a moron or being corrupt?
(...) I would say being labeled a moron is far better than being labeled corrupt. (...) Why stop with Dubya? We should get rid of the whole lot and reinstate the constitution as our basis of government. (You know where everyone follows the same (...) (22 years ago, 9-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

		Re: What's worse--being a moron or being corrupt?
(...) Was the term not "moronic"? Scott A (...) (22 years ago, 9-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

		Re: What's worse--being a moron or being corrupt?
I am going to say that being called corrupt is worse. If one is a moron that usually represents a natural born deficiency, someone who is a moron is not simply unlearned, or unwise, but possessing a level of retardation. To say someone is corrupt (...) (22 years ago, 9-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

7 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search