Subject:
|
Re: La belle province
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 23 Apr 2003 13:39:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3068 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Pedro Silva writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
<snip>
> > If Quebec got its way, what would you do to ensure the rights of the new
> > English speaking minority? From what I hear it's not very pleasant to be an
> > English speaker in Quebec (relatively speaking, mind you... I haven't heard
> > of any ethnic cleansing, thank goodness) as it is.
>
> Then the English-speaking Quebecans would seccede themselves... ;-)
>
>
> Pedro
> (adept of City-states)
Doesn't Texas every once in a while talk about being 'separate' or is that
just a figment of my imagination...
Just wondering...
Dave K
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: La belle province
|
| (...) Nope. They're the only (?? (1) ) state that joined by treaty after being an independent republic rather than being an original founder (that ratified the constitution as the means of joining) or a state formed from unorganised territory that (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: La belle province
|
| (...) I noticed the examples you gave were from nations where democracy was inexistent at the time of the breakup. So I ask: is a democratic nation immune to separatism? I mean, not the sociological phenomena in itself, rather the effective (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
200 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
