To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 20527
20526  |  20528
Subject: 
Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 23 Apr 2003 02:13:23 GMT
Viewed: 
4919 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Matt Hein writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> 
> > After they've been brainwashed since they first could understand words, you
> > mean, by being forced to attend church up til then? We chose not to do that
> > to our children. They can decide for themselves once they're old enough but
> > for now we are not forcing them to attend any church.
> 
> Then what would these children do, should they not
> be forced into church? Hang around at home with a
> babysitter? Sounds kind of anti-social to me.

What is it with you and being social?  :^P

> I wouldn't throw it to  brainwashing, since constant
> preaching 'you will believe' would just scare the
> kids off and product the reciprocal effect. You think
> I believe in god because I was brainwashed? Perhaps
> some of my friends have veered off to that side, but my
> beliefs stem from the reading of the scriptures and
> countless pondering on my part.
> 
> > Also, you say "legitimate, thought provoking and/or sensible" reason. What's
> > the metric for that? Would it be sufficient to say "I simply don't choose to
> > accept the tenets of christianity" or would the child have to present a
> > proof for the non decidability the question of the existance of god, or what?
> 
> Whatever. I think a kid should deliver a response that
> speaks to the heart, to show what they truely believe in.
> No, how can you deliver proof to gods (non)existence
> when finding such proof is theoreticaly impossible?
> If their statement gives the parent reason to think and
> consider, I think that serves well enough.

There is plenty of stuff to prove the bible wrong.  They're called fossils
and really old rocks.

-Stefan-



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community)
 
(...) Then what would these children do, should they not be forced into church? Hang around at home with a babysitter? Sounds kind of anti-social to me. I wouldn't throw it to brainwashing, since constant preaching 'you will believe' would just (...) (24 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

200 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR