To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 20346
20345  |  20347
Subject: 
Re: DU is/is not a problem?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 17 Apr 2003 13:25:02 GMT
Viewed: 
295 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
*what* persistent health concerns?

http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/templates/statements/statementDetails.cfm?StatementID=143




This [HM Government funded] report's author was on Radio 4 the other night. His
study was a desk study; parts of which have been superseded by a UN report:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/2884761.stm

A royal society update:

==+==
Professor Brian Spratt, chairman of the Royal Society working group on depleted
uranium, said that a recent study by the society had found that the majority of
soldiers were unlikely to be exposed to dangerous levels of depleted uranium
during and after its use on the battlefield.

"However, a small number of soldiers might suffer kidney damage and an
increased risk of lung cancer if substantial amounts of depleted uranium are
breathed in, for instance inside an armoured vehicle hit by a depleted uranium
penetrator."

He said the study also concluded that the soil around the impact sites of
depleted uranium penetrators may be heavily contaminated, and could be harmful
if swallowed by children for example.

"In addition, large numbers of corroding depleted uranium penetrators embedded
in the ground might pose a long-term threat if the uranium leaches into water
supplies.

"We recommend that fragments of depleted uranium penetrators should be removed,
and areas of contamination should be identified and, where necessary, made
safe."
==+==

More here:
Scientists urge shell clear-up to protect civilians
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,938336,00.html

Scott A



Message is in Reply To:
  DU is/is not a problem?
 
(...) This [HM Government funded] report's author was on Radio 4 the other night. His study was a desk study; parts of which have been superseded by a UN report: (URL) also conceded that the model he had used was unreliable, that he was not always (...) (22 years ago, 4-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

3 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR