 | | Not necessarily biased, but not particularly brilliant, either —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | From: (URL) looming controversy: U.S. and allied use of depleted uranium in bunker-busting bombs and artillery rounds. Depleted uranium is a byproduct of the uranium that fuels nuclear reactors. It turns to fine dust when shells made from the hard, (...) (22 years ago, 4-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | DU is/is not a problem? —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) This [HM Government funded] report's author was on Radio 4 the other night. His study was a desk study; parts of which have been superseded by a UN report: (URL) also conceded that the model he had used was unreliable, that he was not always (...) (22 years ago, 4-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: DU is/is not a problem? —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) ==+== Professor Brian Spratt, chairman of the Royal Society working group on depleted uranium, said that a recent study by the society had found that the majority of soldiers were unlikely to be exposed to dangerous levels of depleted uranium (...) (21 years ago, 17-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
