 | | Re: My over-simplification of the anti-war movement —Scott Arthur
|
| | | (...) Even that funded by Pakistan? (...) Me too. I'd love to hear what he has to say. Likewise for SH. Do you think Bush would want us to hear about their version of events? (...) Why just "to the United States and her citizens"? (...) Evidence? (...) (21 years ago, 31-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: My over-simplification of the anti-war movement —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) Interestingly, there *IS* an undeniable link between Saddam and the actions and al-Qaeda; bin Laden has explicitly stated that his motives derive in part from his disgust at the overbearing presence of US military in Saudia Arabia. Of course, (...) (21 years ago, 31-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: My over-simplification of the anti-war movement —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) I can’t find a cite , but I thought the US bases dated back to WW2? Scott A (...) (21 years ago, 31-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: My over-simplification of the anti-war movement —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) Maybe I'm getting my timeframe messed up, though I understand that bin Laden's particular beef is with the continued US military presence in the region (apparently greatly increased following Gulf War I). Dave! (21 years ago, 31-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: My over-simplification of the anti-war movement —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) I agree with that. But hey, the Saudia Princes are a freedom loving bunch of guys; they need your support. ;) Scott A (21 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
